Brad Gerstner pushes back on the monopoly framing and emphasizes that Anthropic is still a fledgling startup on an exponential revenue trajectory, and that strong competition (with OpenAI, Google) is exactly what keeps the US at the AI frontier — arguing against any regulatory intervention.
we're talking about annual run rate revenues, David, but on a GAAP basis, they're doing about the same revenue as OpenAI in the month of March” ⚑
Sacks argues Anthropic's unprecedented ARR growth (from $10B to $44B in 4 months) combined with newly secured compute makes it a near-certainty to hit ~$100B ARR by year-end, and potentially the most valuable tech company in history if it sustains its trajectory to ~$1T ARR.
They grew from roughly $10 billion of ARR to $30 billion. So it tripled. And then in April, if anything, the rate of increase seemed to accelerate. They went from $30 to $44 billion of ARR. Nobody in Silicon Valley has ever seen anything” ⚑
Chamath argues Anthropic's revenue trajectory is entirely supply-constrained, not demand-constrained, and that with new compute secured (including the xAI deal), the 5-year outlook is extremely robust and growth will be even more parabolic.
I think the 5-year view for those two companies is quite robust. The thing that they really need is more compute and more power.” ⚑