All holdings

SpaceX

SPCXBullish

Designs, manufactures, and launches rockets and spacecraft, providing commercial and government space transportation services.Yahoo Finance ↗spacex.com

34 takes · first discussed Sep 20, 2024 · last May 22, 2026 · 1 stance reversal

Price since first call
+23.7%
$160.95$199.07
Current call
Bullish+23.7%
since Sep 20, 2024
since Sep 20, 2024 · 1yr 8mo

How the calls played out

Click a call to see the price move since it aired.

prices through Jun 17, 2026
0%$201.80$160.9534 calls near Sep 20, 2024+23.7%Jun 12, 2026Jun 17, 2026
click a chip for the quote + move since call

Where they stand now

ChamathChamath
Bullish

Chamath argues SpaceX can be underwritten at $2T given its Starlink revenue engine, dominant data center build capability (Colossus), and the emerging Elon Web Services business that could reach $40-45B revenue next year and double again, creating compounding capital, technology, and execution moats.

E274 · May 22, 202613 calls
JasonJason
Bullish

Jason argues the Cursor acquisition is highly accretive to SpaceX's IPO story, with complementary compute and coding AI positioning SpaceX/xAI to lead the coding leaderboard within 12 months, at a $2T IPO valuation target.

E270 · Apr 24, 20262 calls
SacksSacks
Neutral

Sacks argues the xAI/Anthropic compute deal solves xAI's biggest structural problem — massive CapEx with no offsetting revenue — by monetizing spare H100 capacity, fixing the balance sheet and allowing SpaceX/xAI to invest in next-gen Grok without the pressure of immediate model revenue.

E272 · May 8, 20264 calls
FriedbergFriedberg
Bullish

Friedberg believes the space industry represents a $15-30 trillion annual economic opportunity on the moon and that SpaceX's eventual IPO will command an insane multiple given the scale of the opportunity.

E266 · Mar 27, 20263 calls
GGuests
Bullish

Gavin Baker argues SpaceX's ability to build data centers faster and cheaper than anyone, combined with Anthropic as a clear offtake partner and orbital compute on the horizon, means its AI/compute business can grow dramatically faster than previously contemplated.

E274 · May 22, 202612 calls

The discussion

The hosts and guests are broadly and increasingly bullish on SpaceX and its constellation of related assets — Starlink, xAI, and now the emerging Elon Web Services hyperscaler business — with conviction rising over time as milestones accumulate. On the core launch and Starlink businesses, Chamath and Friedberg agree that SpaceX is the cheapest, most reliable launch provider with no near-term competitor, and Friedberg and Chamath see Starlink scaling from 4 million to potentially 100+ million subscribers; Sacks adds that political obstruction, not technical merit, is the main barrier to broader Starlink adoption. On xAI and Grok, there is near-unanimous bullishness from Friedberg, Chamath, Sacks, and repeat guests Gavin Baker and Antonio Gracias, who collectively cite the Colossus cluster's engineering feat, Grok's rapid benchmark progression from competitive to best-in-class (Grok 3 through Grok 4), and the synergistic distribution advantage of X integration as compounding moats — with Chamath and Baker going furthest in claiming Grok 4 is now meaningfully ahead of all rivals. The main point of disagreement is structural: guest Mark Cuban is bearish on X's advertising business due to brand-safety concerns, while Antonio Gracias and Brad Gerstner argue the X turnaround and xAI compute monetization (including deals with Anthropic and Cursor) have resolved the platform's financial challenges; additionally, Chamath holds a contrarian view that SpaceX will not IPO independently but reverse-merge into Tesla, while Friedberg, Jason, Baker, and Chamath (in other remarks) all anticipate and eagerly await a standalone IPO at valuations ranging up to $2T+ on 40–50x revenue multiples.

How they got there

ChamathChamath13 mentions since Jan 18, 2025
’26
BullishE274May 22, 2026

Chamath argues SpaceX can be underwritten at $2T given its Starlink revenue engine, dominant data center build capability (Colossus), and the emerging Elon Web Services business that could reach $40-45B revenue next year and double again, creating compounding capital, technology, and execution moats.

you're buying it at 20 times revenue. And you would say, well, why can you buy a company like this on revenue versus earnings and cash flow? And I think the reason is because what the revenue does is it gives him the operating leverage to1:03:43
JasonJason2 mentions since Feb 7, 2026
BullishE270Apr 24, 2026

Jason argues the Cursor acquisition is highly accretive to SpaceX's IPO story, with complementary compute and coding AI positioning SpaceX/xAI to lead the coding leaderboard within 12 months, at a $2T IPO valuation target.

I predict that this is going to move SpaceX, xAI, and Cursor to the front of the coding leaderboard within 12 months. That's my prediction.7:07
SacksSacks4 mentions since Sep 20, 2024
’25
’26
NeutralE272May 8, 2026

Sacks argues the xAI/Anthropic compute deal solves xAI's biggest structural problem — massive CapEx with no offsetting revenue — by monetizing spare H100 capacity, fixing the balance sheet and allowing SpaceX/xAI to invest in next-gen Grok without the pressure of immediate model revenue.

This deal fixes that problem. Elon's now able to have a frontier model company, but he's able to now not have these massive unpaid-for CapEx commitments... it solves a major problem for them and their balance sheet.13:16
FriedbergFriedberg3 mentions since Oct 18, 2024
’25
’26
BullishE266Mar 27, 2026

Friedberg believes the space industry represents a $15-30 trillion annual economic opportunity on the moon and that SpaceX's eventual IPO will command an insane multiple given the scale of the opportunity.

I actually think there's probably a $15 to $30 trillion a year economic opportunity on the moon. That kind of a business, like you're going to see with SpaceX's IPO, is going to have an insane multiple.36:26
GGuests12 mentions since Oct 3, 2024
flipped once
’25
’26
Gavin BakerBullishE274May 22, 2026

Gavin Baker argues SpaceX's ability to build data centers faster and cheaper than anyone, combined with Anthropic as a clear offtake partner and orbital compute on the horizon, means its AI/compute business can grow dramatically faster than previously contemplated.

there's a stat in it that for, I think, the, their first data center was 122 days. The second one, it took them 91 days. The third one was, I think, 66 days. They build data centers dramatically faster than anyone else. At a lower cost.48:19
iAbout these quotes
Quotes are machine-transcribed from the episode audio — use the Listen links to verify any take against the source, or the ⚑ link to report a problem. Takes marked unverified, low-conviction, or commentary-only never move stances, the index, or the funds.