The All-Index
E270Apr 24, 2026

SpaceX-Cursor Deal, SaaS Debt Bomb, New Apple CEO, SPLC Indictment, Colon Cancer Spike

Takes
9
Companies
4
Right so far
1
Wrong so far
1

Directional takes judged by each stock's move since this episode aired.

SacksSacksBullish

Sacks views SpaceX and Cursor as highly complementary — SpaceX provides compute and a foundation model while Cursor brings coding expertise, enterprise clients, and training data — and believes the deal will accelerate xAI in the white-hot coding/cyber AI market.

Cursor brings to xAI the training data, a lot of enterprise clients, and the experience in coding. And I think this will accelerate xAI in this area.
ChamathChamathBullish

Chamath argues SpaceX is effectively acquiring Cursor at a ~50% discount via stock at a $2T IPO valuation, getting valuable coding IP, RL training data, and a crack team while monetizing excess Colossus GPU capacity — calling it a very smart deal.

He can issue $60 billion of stock at a $2 trillion valuation and get a model and a service that I think is extremely compelling in coding... He gets all of that, and then he gets a very crack team.
JasonJasonBullish

Jason argues the Cursor acquisition is accretive to SpaceX's revenue story ahead of its IPO, predicting the combined entity will dominate the AI coding leaderboard within 12 months and supporting the $2 trillion IPO valuation target.

I predict that this is going to move SpaceX, xAI, and Cursor to the front of the coding leaderboard within 12 months. That's my prediction.
SalesforceCRM-8.2% since this episode
ChamathChamathNeutral

Chamath acknowledges Salesforce looks cheap at 10x free cash flow by historical standards but warns that if AI compresses long-term cash flows, the terminal multiple could drop to 3–5x FCF — making the 'cheap' valuation potentially misleading regardless of business quality.

Is Salesforce a good buy at 10 times free cash flow? Historical artifacts would tell us a screaming yes. The problem is that if you cut everybody's cash flows off at year 5 or 6 or 7, then all of a sudden I think you see the natural
SacksSacksBullish📌 position call✗ wrong so far

Sacks suggests Salesforce at ~3x ARR and less than 10x free cash flow may be a bargain, citing Benioff's track record of riding every prior tech wave and his willingness to adapt — while acknowledging cash flow predictability risk from AI disruption.

He's made every previous wave work to his benefit, whether it was social, whether it was mobile, whether it was big data... What are the odds he's going to make AI work to his benefit? I'd say pretty good. So his stock might be a bargain
FriedbergFriedbergMixed

Friedberg acknowledges Salesforce faces severe SaaS headwinds from AI agent substitution but argues its founder-led willingness to go headless and embrace MCP — unlike Workday — positions it as a potential winner among large legacy SaaS platforms.

Danny Yeltsin's the exact opposite, which is he's like, okay, we're going to go headless for the whole thing, which is brilliant... that's going to be the distinction of winners here and the losers.
AppleAAPL+6.8% since this episode
SacksSacksBullish✓ right so far

Sacks credits Tim Cook with growing Apple's market cap over 10x and improving revenue quality by shifting to services, and expresses cautious optimism that Benioff-like adaptability under new CEO Ternus could extend the run — suggesting the stock may not be impaired.

The market cap of the company went up by over 10x. The revenue grew from roughly $100 billion a year to over $400 billion a year. He also improved the quality of revenue by moving the mix into services.
ChamathChamathMixed

Chamath praises Tim Cook as an elite capital allocator who returned ~50% of shares and built proprietary silicon, but warns incoming CEO Ternus must navigate away from iPhone-dependent per-unit pricing as AI and heterogeneous devices erode that moat.

The problem with the per-unit pricing being as high as it is... AI rips open the canvas of the devices that we will use to interact with information and knowledge... I think the moats decay. I think if that happens, that's problematic if
JasonJasonBullish

Jason sees Cursor as a money-printing machine on a path from $2B to $6B run rate in 2026, and believes the SpaceX deal — which solves Cursor's compute constraints — is peanut butter-and-chocolate complementarity that will vault it to the top of the coding leaderboard.

Cursor's run rate, $2 billion at the end of February. This is a money printing machine. They expect to end 2026 with a $6 billion run rate... this is peanut butter and chocolate if you put these two together.