Friedberg argues Anthropic's AI restrictions are actively harming his genomics business by blocking legitimate scientific research, forcing companies to abandon the platform in favor of open-source (often Chinese) models, which will damage Anthropic's enterprise customer base.
we are likely going to end up needing to use open source models and run them locally ourselves... The restrictions that Anthropic and others are putting upon themselves and upon the industry is forcing a lot of companies to go and get open” ⚑
Sacks argues Anthropic is engaged in a regulatory capture campaign, conducting mandatory surveillance of all user prompts, secretly downgrading outputs for disfavored users in an anti-competitive manner, and pushing for government regulation to eliminate open-source competitors — making them deeply untrustworthy.
8 months ago I said that Anthropic was engaged in a very sophisticated regulatory capture campaign based on fearmongering, and people at the time thought that was a very spicy take. But 8 months later, I think you're hearing a lot of” ⚑
Chamath argues Anthropic's prompt surveillance, censorship of outputs, and lack of KYC creates serious business risk for enterprise customers and reveals a regulatory capture agenda that makes it a non-starter for corporations needing reliable AI access.
if you're a company, I think it's almost a non-starter. And the reason is because you could accidentally trip one of these things without even knowing it.” ⚑