Major U.S. newspaper and digital news outlet covering national politics, policy, and world affairs.washingtonpost.com ↗
1 take · first discussed Mar 1, 2025
Private company — no public price to score. We track what they said; valuation-mark tracking is on the roadmap.
The lone view represented comes from Chamath, who is bearish (with low conviction) on the Washington Post's prospects. He argues that Bezos's decision to limit op-ed scope to free-market and personal-liberty topics is self-contradictory — restricting speech in the name of personal liberty — and is unlikely to reverse the outlet's struggles. Rather than broadening its audience, Chamath believes this editorial narrowing will further entrench the Post within an already limited Beltway readership. No other hosts offered views, so no agreement or disagreement can be noted.
Chamath is skeptical that Bezos's decision to restrict editorial scope to free-market/personal-liberty opinions will improve the Washington Post's business, arguing it further polarizes an already narrow Beltway readership rather than expanding it.
I think if you want to write about personal liberty, one of the tenets of personal liberty is free speech, but he's effectively said that certain opinions aren't allowed anymore. I don't think that that's the solution to the Washington”1:11:28