Skip to content
PLTR▲ 366.5%GOOGL▲ 81.4%GLD▲ 48.8%IPO▲ 18.9%AAPL▲ 5.0%URA▲ 28.4%CPER▲ 3.0%MAGS▲ 19.4%AMZN▼ 0.5%DBC▲ 20.6%TSLA▼ 0.8%LNG▼ 12.9%KWEB▼ 7.4%IBIT▼ 4.7%NFLX▼ 24.5%
All holdings

MP Materials

MPCommentary

Mines and processes rare earth materials used in magnets, electric vehicles, and defense applications.Yahoo Finance ↗mpmaterials.com ↗

2 takes · first discussed Oct 17, 2025

Where they land
Commentary
Who's weighed in
ChamathFriedberg
Takes
2
First discussed
Oct 17, 2025

Commentary only — they've discussed this name but haven't made a call on it, so we don't attribute any call return to it. The stock's price chart and the takes are below.

How the stock has moved

The price since they started discussing it. Click a mention to see where it stood — these are comments, not calls.

prices through Jul 13, 2026
0%$80.79$48.262 comments near Oct 17, 2025-35.4%Oct 17, 2025Jul 10, 2026
click a chip for the quote + move since comment

Where they stand now

ChamathChamath
Commentary

Chamath argues that public-private partnerships anchored by the US government acting as buyer of record for rare earths — like MP's deal with GM and the US government — are the only practical way to compete with Chinese mercantilism and protect domestic rare earth producers from Chinese price dumping.

E247 · Oct 17, 20251 call ↓
FriedbergFriedberg
Commentary

Friedberg highlights MP Materials as the key US rare earth mining asset (Mountain Pass mine) that has secured a government deal to revitalize domestic production, positioning it as a beneficiary of US efforts to reshore rare earth supply chains.

E247 · Oct 17, 20251 call ↓

The discussion

Both Friedberg and Chamath view MP Materials broadly neutrally but with strategic importance, agreeing that its Mountain Pass mine is the central US rare earth asset and that its recent government deal is a meaningful development. Friedberg frames the company primarily as a beneficiary of US reshoring efforts, highlighting the significance of the government partnership in revitalizing domestic production. Chamath goes further in conviction, arguing that the public-private structure — with the US government acting as a buyer of record — is structurally necessary to shield domestic rare earth producers like MP from Chinese price dumping, and that only the US balance sheet can credibly create a strategic reserve around these inputs. Neither host expresses disagreement; the divergence is one of emphasis, with Chamath placing greater weight on the geopolitical and structural logic of the model itself.

How they got there

ChamathChamath1 mention since Oct 17, 2025
NeutralE247Oct 17, 2025⚑

Chamath argues that public-private partnerships anchored by the US government acting as buyer of record for rare earths — like MP's deal with GM and the US government — are the only practical way to compete with Chinese mercantilism and protect domestic rare earth producers from Chinese price dumping.

Why is the federal government stepping in to create what is essentially a last resort buyer of record? It is so critical in these markets because the US balance sheet is the only one that can create a strategic reserve around these inputs”29:39
FriedbergFriedberg1 mention since Oct 17, 2025
NeutralE247Oct 17, 2025⚑

Friedberg highlights MP Materials as the key US rare earth mining asset (Mountain Pass mine) that has secured a government deal to revitalize domestic production, positioning it as a beneficiary of US efforts to reshore rare earth supply chains.

The asset, the Mountain Pass mine that Molycorp operated became MP Materials, which Chamath knows well, and did this big deal recently with the US government as they've tried to revitalize production at this mine and increase output.”22:54
iAbout these quotes
Quotes are machine-transcribed from the episode audio — use the Listen links to verify any take against the source, or the ⚑ link to report a problem. Takes marked unverified, low-conviction, or commentary-only never move stances, the index, or the funds.