Friedberg debunks Burry's short thesis, arguing Nvidia's customers are correctly applying GAAP depreciation because chips still generate revenue after 6 years, and all cash flows are fully visible in financial statements — there is no hidden accounting.
Burry is incorrect in thinking that they're hiding anything because it's all there. They're following GAAP standards. And then investors make a market and they all decide, what do I want to value this company on?” ⚑
Chamath argues Burry's bear thesis on Nvidia is wrong because it misunderstands how AI output tokens generate real revenue, validating chip useful-life depreciation schedules, and that Nvidia's customers are rationally managing token economics.
He doesn't appreciate is that obviously Google and Facebook and Microsoft and OpenAI, and X are not going to be in the business of generating negative revenue output tokens just for the sake of it.” ⚑
Friedberg sees Nvidia's dominance as potentially threatened long-term by the rise of purpose-built, specialized chips for different AI workloads and architectures, and specifically flags Huawei as a potential black-swan challenger by 2026-2027.
There's a risk to NVIDIA... the other black swan that I think is missing in the equation today, and my early prediction for 2026, is Huawei, where I think that there's lithography technology that exists in China that is not publicly” ⚑