Sacks supports the government taking equity in Intel rather than giving outright grants, arguing it's a better deal for taxpayers, creates the right incentives, and addresses the national security imperative of onshoring chip manufacturing.
If you are going to hand out billions of dollars to these companies, you're better off at least getting something for it, having the taxpayers have some upside in it, allowing the government to recoup, and creating the right incentive for” ⚑
Chamath argues the US government taking a 10% equity stake in Intel—rather than giving free grants—is a smart model that gives taxpayers upside while strategically supporting domestic chip manufacturing to compete with China.
I think that this approach is the much better approach, which is to say we can do exactly what China did with a couple of tweaks... own something on the balance sheet of the United States, not have a golden vote, have complete” ⚑