Sacks supports the government taking equity in Intel in exchange for CHIPS Act funding as a better deal for taxpayers than free grants, creating proper incentives and allowing possible upside recovery, given the national security imperative to onshore chip manufacturing.
If you are going to hand out billions of dollars to these companies, you're better off at least, again, getting something for it, having the taxpayers have some upside in it, allowing the government to recoup, and creating the right” ⚑
Chamath argues the US government taking equity in Intel (rather than giving free grants) is the right model — it gives taxpayers upside, mirrors China's strategic champion approach but without a golden vote, and allows capital markets to finance the business competitively.
I think that this approach is the much better approach, which is to say we can do exactly what China did with a couple of tweaks... have complete transparency, allow the capital markets to finance these businesses, but give them a chance” ⚑