Sacks argues OpenAI has actual subscription revenue, a dominant consumer position, and is replacing search — the internet's most lucrative franchise — making a $500B valuation justifiable.
I mean, look, OpenAI has actual revenue. I mean, they have actual revenue because they have subscriptions and they appear to have the dominant position in the consumer space. And it is a replacement for a lot of people for search, which is” ⚑
Chamath makes a bull case for OpenAI at a $500B valuation by extrapolating MAU/DAU growth and applying a fraction of Facebook/Google ARPU, arriving at a potential $1.5T valuation in 4 years.
At 2 billion DAO, they generate a 10th of Facebook's revenue, just to be very conservative. And you probably get to a trillion 5 valuation there.” ⚑