Sacks argues that the Biden-Harris administration's politically motivated revocation of Starlink's rural broadband contract—despite Starlink being the superior and most cost-effective solution—represents unfair retaliation against the best-in-class provider, implying Starlink's competitive position is stronger than government treatment suggests.
Brendan Carr pointed this out. He said that in 2023, the FCC canceled or revoked an $885 million contract with the company by claiming Starlink is not capable of providing high-speed internet. Then a year later— of course, that was a lie.” ⚑