Operates shared electric scooter rentals in cities across the US and internationally.Yahoo Finance ↗bird.co ↗
2 takes · first discussed Apr 17, 2026
Commentary only — they've discussed this name but haven't made a call on it, so we don't attribute any call return to it. The stock's price chart and the takes are below.
The price since they started discussing it. Click a mention to see where it stood — these are comments, not calls.
Jason characterizes Allbirds as a peak-ZIRP collective delusion that was never worth billions, having sold off brand assets for $39M—about 10% of its IPO raise—before pivoting to an AI data-center shell as a meme stock.
Sacks argues Allbirds' pivot to AI is reminiscent of the late-90s dot-com era name-change pump, where companies got huge valuation pops just by appending '.com,' with no underlying business substance.
Both Jason and Sacks are bearish on Allbirds, viewing it as a cautionary tale of ZIRP-era excess with no lasting business value. Jason is particularly scathing, pointing to the sale of the company's brand assets for just $39M—roughly 10% of its IPO raise—as proof the original business was never worth its lofty valuation, and dismissing its pivot to an AI data-center shell as meme-stock opportunism. Sacks echoes this skepticism with medium conviction, drawing a direct parallel to the late-1990s dot-com era, when companies won speculative valuation pops simply by appending ".com" to their names, arguing Allbirds' AI rebrand carries equally little underlying substance. The two hosts are fully aligned in their cynicism, differing only in the emphasis Jason places on the destruction of shareholder value and Sacks places on the historical pattern of name-change-driven pumps.
Jason characterizes Allbirds as a peak-ZIRP collective delusion that was never worth billions, having sold off brand assets for $39M—about 10% of its IPO raise—before pivoting to an AI data-center shell as a meme stock.
They sold off all their brand assets for $39 million, about 10% of what they raised in the IPO. Congratulations to whoever owns those ugly-ass sneakers.”35:07
Sacks argues Allbirds' pivot to AI is reminiscent of the late-90s dot-com era name-change pump, where companies got huge valuation pops just by appending '.com,' with no underlying business substance.
This reminds me of the late '90s where all you had to do was change your name to whatever.com. And you get a huge pop in your valuation.”34:48