Sacks argues Apple's App Store practices—mandatory routing, no sideloading, and a 30% take rate—are anti-competitive and should be cracked down on by regulators, posing a risk to Apple's high-margin services business.
Apple, really good example, because they drive everything through the App Store. You're not allowed to do sideloading. They want to take, what is it, 30% piece of any sales.” ⚑
Reid Hoffman identifies Apple's App Store as the prime antitrust target among big tech, arguing that mandatory use of the App Store and its payment mechanism quells startup innovation and represents anti-competitive behavior that regulators should address, creating a meaningful legal/regulatory risk to Apple's high-margin services revenue.
the prime candidate is likely to be, and I'm speaking as an individual and as a venture capitalist here, is Apple with the App Store, right?… You have to use App Store. You have to use the payment mechanism… that quells a ton of startup inn”