Sacks argues Apple's App Store monopoly—mandatory 30% fees, no sideloading, no competing payment links—constitutes anti-competitive behavior that regulators should crack down on, even if broad M&A restrictions are wrong.
Apple, really good example, because they drive everything through the App Store. You're not allowed to do sideloading. They want to take, what is it, 30% piece of any sales. You're not even allowed to have a link inside an application to” ⚑
Reid Hoffman singles out Apple's App Store as the prime candidate for antitrust intervention, arguing that mandatory payment rails, no sideloading, and a 30% take rate quell startup innovation and represent an anti-competitive monopoly that regulators should address.
I think the prime candidate is likely to be, and I'm speaking as an individual and as a venture capitalist here, is Apple with the App Store... you could just give the consumers the option to allow sideloading.” ⚑